Cedar Components · Seal pack SP-14
NC-44 / Label mismatch response
Link receipt evidence, supplier action and the next-lot verification.
Received units1,200Two linked supplier lots
Observed nonconforming36 / 3.00%36 ÷ 1,200 screened units
Contained suspect units180Includes the 36 observed units
Verification defects1 / 300Policy: 300 screened; zero defects
Receipt and containment scope
SCAR-44 asks the supplier to investigate the wrong label revision.
| Supplier lot | Screened | Observed | Contained | Scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-701 · Receipt R-81 | 800 | 24 | 120 | Linked |
| L-702 · Receipt R-82 | 400 | 12 | 60 | Confirm extent |
| Total | 1,200 | 36 | 180 | Edition 1 |
180 suspect units are contained for disposition review. Closing SCAR-44 does not authorize stock release.
Observed requirement
PO-208 specifies label revision C. Receipts R-81 and R-82 include revision B labels. Preserve the inspection reference and supplier lot links when the response changes.
SCAR-44 · Supplier response
Correct the labeling process at its source.
Submitted response must identify the cause, implemented action and supporting evidence.
Verification plan VP-44
Test the response against later deliveries.
Example acceptance rule: screen at least 300 units after implementation, with zero label mismatches.
| Verification lot | Screened | Observed defects | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-801 | 200 | 0 | Check EC-801 |
| E-802 | 100 | Check EC-802 |
1 / 300 = 0.33%
Change a count only against corrected inspection evidence. The example allows 0–100 whole units.
Quality reviewer decision
0 closure decisions
Use Quality reviewer for the decision. Stores disposition remains a separate record.