Identify the controlled assembly baseline
Record assembly, revision, source document, owner, effective context and release reference before component rows are interpreted.
Workflow blueprint
A bill of materials needs configuration lineage, not a latest-file shortcut
An educational baseline-to-build record for manufacturing teams, without design authority, planning automation, costing or configuration certification.
Give each assembly baseline a durable identity, relate components and quantities to effectivity, route substitutions through human approval and compare the released structure with observed build evidence.
TL;DR — Give each assembly baseline a durable identity, relate components and quantities to effectivity, route substitutions through human approval and compare the released structure with observed build evidence.
Structure component and effectivity evidence
Keep part identity, stated quantity, unit, position, optionality and start or stop applicability attributable to the supplied source.
Route substitution and revision questions
Link the proposed alternative, reason, affected assemblies, reviewer decision and supersession relationship without changing an old baseline.
Compare release with the build observation
Capture issued baseline, picked references, reported differences, disposition owner and unresolved configuration question for later review.
Page-specific decision aid
A baseline-to-build revision matrix preserving components, effectivity, substitutes, where-used and observed differences
The matrix follows assembly AX-4 from revision C through an effectivity cutover, a component quantity correction, one proposed substitute, three where-used results, approval against a later source, a build packet still citing revision C and an observed difference awaiting disposition.
- ✓The newest revision is not automatically effective.
- ✓Available stock does not authorise a substitute.
- ✓A build observation is not a configuration verdict.
Scope first
What Codeblix would confirm before implementation
This page is an operational blueprint. The final workflow, screens, permissions and integrations depend on your current process and agreed implementation scope.
- ✓Assembly revision remains explicit on every component relationship
- ✓Effectivity is recorded independently from stock availability
- ✓Substitutes require a named decision and affected-use review
- ✓CAD PLM MRP stock supplier cost quality and correct-configuration proof excluded
Relevant Codeblix foundations
Review the existing product areas that support the proposed workflow.
Use the related planning tools
Run the operational calculation, save the result in the URL and share it with your team.
Map this workflow to your operation
Tell Codeblix how work moves today. We will confirm the practical scope before proposing an implementation.
Discuss your workflow